Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (10)
- Bachelor Thesis (2)
- Master's Thesis (2)
Year of publication
- 2020 (14) (remove)
Language
- English (14) (remove)
Keywords
- Blockchain (14) (remove)
Institute
To enable smart devices of the internet of things to be connected to a blockchain, a blockchain client needs to run on this hardware. With the Trustless Incentivized Remote Node Network, in short Incubed, it will be possible to establish a decentralized and secure network of remote nodes, which enables trustworthy and fast access to a blockchain for a large number of low-performance IoT devices. Currently, Incubed supports the verification of Ethereum data. To serve a wider audience and more applications this paper proposes the verification of Bitcoin data as well, which can be achieved due to the modularity of Incubed. This paper describes the proof data that is necessary for a client to prove the correctness of a node’s response and the process to verify the response by using this proof data as well. A proof-object which contains the proof data will be part of every response in addition to the actual result. We design, implement and evaluate Bitcoin verification for Incubed. Creation of the proof data for supported methods (on the server-side) and the verification process using this proof data (on the client-side) has been demonstrated. This enables the verification of Bitcoin in Incubed.
The number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices is increasing rapidly. The Trustless Incentivized Remote Node Network, in short IN3 (Incubed), enables trustworthy and fast access to a blockchain for a large number of low-performance IoT devices. Although currently IN3 only supports the verification of Ethereum data, it is not limited to one blockchain due to modularity. This thesis describes the fundamentals, the concept and the implementation of the Bitcoin verification in IN3.
Tokenization projects are currently very present when it comes to new blockchain technologies. After explaining the fundamentals of cross-chain interaction, the bachelor thesis will focus on tokenizing technology for Bitcoin on Ethereum. To get a more practical context, implementing the currently most successful decentralized tokenization project is described.
The financial world of blockchains is mostly covered by Bitcoin, taking up about 210 billion dollars in market cap. Despite the huge security and independence which the technology offers to the users, it's not quite easy to adapt with upcoming applications due to the regulated infrastructure behind. For small-scale transactions, everyday use applications or the access to a variety of crypto technologies and projects, Bitcoin is relatively limited in future development. The compatibility for most of those applications is covering currencies from more development-driven blockchains like Ethereum. Those want to reach out for the user base that's already in hold of Bitcoins and offer them a seamless transition to new applications without the risk of losing their funds. Within the article, atomic swaps and tokenization are covered up and current approaches compared. Both mechanisms are used to fulfill this symbiosis between Bitcoin and Ethereum.
To get a more practical view, an example on how to implement such a tokenization within an app is shown. This will give deeper insights and offers inspiration for digital identity-based app development.
The set of transactions that occurs on the public ledger of an Ethereum network in a specific time frame can be represented as a directed graph, with vertices representing addresses and an edge indicating the interaction between two addresses.
While there exists preliminary research on analyzing an Ethereum network by the means of graph analysis, most existing work is focused on either the public Ethereum Mainnet or on analyzing the different semantic transaction layers using
static graph analysis in order to carve out the different network properties (such as interconnectivity, degrees of centrality, etc.) needed to characterize a blockchain network. By analyzing the consortium-run bloxberg Proof-of-Authority (PoA) Ethereum network, we show that we can identify suspicious and potentially malicious behaviour of network participants by employing statistical graph analysis. We thereby show that it is possible to identify the potentially malicious
exploitation of an unmetered and weakly secured blockchain network resource. In addition, we show that Temporal Network Analysis is a promising technique to identify the occurrence of anomalies in a PoA Ethereum network.
With the increasing usage of blockchain technology, legal challenges such as GDPR compliance arise. Especially the right of erasure is considered challenging as blockchains are tamperproof by design. Several approaches investigated
possibilities to weaken the tamperproof aspect of blockchains in favor of GDPR compliance. This paper presents several approaches, then focuses on chameleon hash functions by evaluating the possibility to use these specific functions in a private blockchain. The goal of the built system is to take a step towards the digitization of the bill of lading used in international trade. This paper describes the developed software as well as the core considerations around the system such as network design or block structure.
Mathematics Behind the Zcash
(2020)
Among all the new developed cryptocurrencies from Bitcoin, Zcash comes out to be the strongest cryptocurrency providing both transparency and anonymity to the transactions and its users by deploying the strong mathematics of zk-SNARKs.
We discussed the zero knowledge proofs which is a basic building block for providing the functionality to zk-SNARKs. It offers schnorr and sigma protocols with interactive and noninteractive versions. Non-interactive proofs are further used in Zcash transactions where the validation of sent transaction is proved by cryptographic proof.
Further, we deploy zk-SNARKs proofs following common reference string as public parameter when transaction is made. The proof allows sender to prove that she knows a secret for an instance such that the proof is succinct, can be verified very efficiently and does not leak the
secret. Non-malleability, small proofs and very effective verification make zk-SNARKs a classic tool in Zcash. Since we deal with NP problems therefore we have considered the elliptic curve cryptography to provide the same security like RSA but with smaller parameter size.
Lastly, we explain Zcash transaction process after minting the coin, the corresponding transaction completely hides the sender, receiver and amount of transaction using zero knowledge proof.
As future considerations, we talk about the improvements that can be done in term of decentralization, efficiency by comparing with top ranked cryptocurrencies namely Ethereum and Monero, privacy preserving against the thread of quantum computers and enhancements in shielded transactions.
Mathematics behind the Zcash
(2020)
Among all the new developed cryptocurrencies, Zcash comes out to be the strongest cryptocurrency providing both transparency and anonymity to the transactions and its users by deploying the strong mathematics of zk-SNARKs. We discussed the zero knowledge proofs as a building block for providing the functionality to zk-SNARKs. It offers schnorr protocol which is further used in Zcash transactions where the validation of sent transaction is proved by cryptographic proof. Further, we deploy zk-SNARKs following common reference string that allows sender to prove that she knows a secret such that the proof is succinct, can be verified and does not leak the secret. Non-malleability, small proofs and effective verification make zk-SNARKs a classic tool in Zcash. We deal with NP problems therefore we have considered the elliptic curve cryptography to provide the security. Lastly, we explain Zcash transaction, the corresponding transaction completely hides the sender, receiver and amount of transaction using zero knowledge proof.
After creating a new blockchain transaction, the next step usually is to make miners aware of it by having it propagated through the blockchain’s peer-to-peer network. We study an unintended alternative to peer-to-peer propagation: Exclusive mining. Exclusive mining is a type of collusion between a transaction initiator and a single miner (or mining pool). The initiator sends transactions through a private channel directly to the miner instead of propagating them through the peerto-peer network. Other blockchain users only become aware of these transactions once they have been included in a block by the miner. We identify three possible motivations for engaging in exclusive mining: (i) reducing transaction cost volatility (“confirmation as a service”), (ii) hiding unconfirmed transactions from the network to prevent frontrunning and (iii) camouflaging wealth transfers as transaction costs to evade taxes or launder money. We further outline why exclusive mining is difficult to prevent and introduce metrics which can be used to identify mining pools engaging in exclusive mining activity.